04/05/2026

First page Previous page 10 Next page Last page

MONDAY | MAY 4, 2026

COMMENT by Prof Datuk Dr Ahmad Ibrahim

When dogma undermines development F OR decades, the prescription for

economic prosperity in the global south has been unwavering, delivered with the certainty of a religious creed: liberalise trade, open your markets and growth will follow. This doctrine, championed by powerful international financial institutions and Western governments, has been presented not as a policy choice but as an inevitability – the only path to “development”. Yet, as economist Jomo Kwame Sundaram compellingly argues, this grand experiment has, for many nations, been a catastrophic failure. The promise of trade liberalisation has often been a mirage, obscuring a reality of deindustrialisation, entrenched inequality and the erosion of national sovereignty. The central finding in Sundaram’s critique is a historical amnesia that plagues the free trade evangelists. The narrative ignores the fact that every single major developed economy – from Britain and the United States to post-war Japan and South Korea – built its industrial base behind high tariff walls and strategic state intervention. They practised protectionism to nurture infant industries, only advocating for free trade after they had achieved a dominant competitive advantage. To demand that developing countries skip this foundational stage is not just unfair; it is an economic trap. It forces them to permanently compete in a game where the rules were written by, and for, the established players. The results, as Sundaram outlines, are visible in the crippling of domestic manufacturing across Africa, Latin America and parts of Asia. Premature exposure to a flood of often-subsidised imports from industrial powerhouses has decimated local industries that could not compete from day one. This has not led to a shift to more “efficient” sectors but to a dangerous over-reliance on exporting raw commodities – a return to the colonial era pattern that locks nations into volatile, low-value markets. Instead of climbing the ladder of value-added

The promise of trade liberalisation has often been a mirage, obscuring a reality of deindustrialisation, entrenched inequality and the erosion of national sovereignty. – AMIRUL SYAFIQ THESUN

“The path forward requires a fundamental rethinking. Developing countries must reclaim the right to use the very tools that all rich nations used on their own ascent.

to global financial volatility and placing food security, job creation and technological learning at the heart of trade policy. The era of treating free trade as a sacred doctrine must end. As Sundaram’s analysis shows, development is not a passive process achieved by surrendering to global markets; it is an active, strategic project of national construction. It is time to dismantle the dogma and restore to nations the freedom to write their own economic stories. The analysis should provide us with a stark reminder that all trade agreements have hidden agendas. This is where proper scrutiny is mandatory. Prof Datuk Dr Ahmad Ibrahim is affiliated with the Tan Sri Omar Centre for STI Policy Studies at UCSI University and is an Adjunct Professor at the Ungku Aziz Centre for Development Studies, Universiti Malaya. Comments: letters@thesundaily.com

conditional industrial policies. The modern liberalisation orthodoxy, enforced through loan conditionalities and trade deals, systematically strips this toolkit from governments. They are left with one blunt instrument – macroeconomic austerity – and told that the market will magically provide what deliberate, strategic state action once could. This is not a call for autarky or a blanket rejection of trade. Trade is indispensable. The argument, rather, is for smart, strategic and sequenced trade policies subservient to a national development vision – not the other way around. It is a call to recognise that the Washington Consensus model has delivered fragile, unequal growth at best and hollowed-out economies at worst. The path forward requires a fundamental rethinking. Developing countries must reclaim the right to use the very tools that all rich nations used on their own ascent. It means building regional markets and value chains for resilience, carefully managing exposure

production, they find that the rungs have been sawed off in the name of liberalisation. Furthermore, the mantra of liberalisation has been a Trojan horse for corporate power. Trade agreements negotiated under this paradigm have expanded far beyond tariffs to include stringent intellectual property rules that hike medicine prices, restrict technology transfer and include investor-state dispute settlement mechanisms. These allow foreign corporations to sue governments for enacting public health or environmental regulations that might dent their profits. In this light, liberalisation becomes less about “free trade” and more about tying the hands of democratic states, privileging corporate rights over national development goals and public welfare. Perhaps the most pernicious finding is how this ideological straitjacket has suffocated policy space. The development playbook of the 20th century required agility: the use of tariffs, subsidies, capital controls and

Education retains its importance in the Malaysian landscape for parents, students and stakeholders. The changes are fast paced with new developments in new fields of study such as cybersecurity, data protection, augmented and virtual reality, machine learning in education, digital education and artificial Intelligence. Leading the way are universities, who are invited to showcase their latest programmes, curriculum and content in our Education Focus for 2026.

thesun.my

Made with FlippingBook - Online Brochure Maker