21/01/2026

WEDNESDAY | JAN 21, 2026

Read

iPaper at Malaysian Paper

www.thesun.my Free access to iPaper PDF Download

app from the App Store or Google Play TM . Malaysian Paper or download

SCAN ME

SCAN ME

Malaysian Paper

Bonnie hopes to powerlift two golds

Remorseful Diaz apologises

- Story on page 29

- Story on page 31

Dangerous precedent Senegal’s circus in Afcon final will require emphatic response to prevent game from falling into state of lawlessness Ű BY WILL CASTLE

make a critical decision. The Royal Moroccan Football Federation has confirmed its inten tion to pursue legal action with Caf and Fifa to rule Senegal’s walk-off. The fight for retribution has begun. Fifa were approached by The Independent regarding precedent for such an incident, and they were unable to provide any. It therefore falls to the game’s leaders and law makers to set a precedent. In a World Cup year, it must be the right one. “It is unacceptable to leave the field of play in this manner, and equally, violence cannot be tolerated in our sport, it is simply not right,” Fifa president Gianni Infantino said in an initial statement, suggesting that sub sequent action will need to act as a deterrence for the future. “The ugly scenes witnessed today must be condemned and never repeated. I reiterated that they have no place in football and I expect that the relevant disciplinary bodies at Caf will take the appropriate measures.” There will be an argument for Senegal to be stripped of their title, given that by Caf’s own rulebook, their actions were grounds to forfeit the final. \ Such a verdict will naturally be highly contentious, though maybe it’s warranted to prevent such a circus from unfolding at this level again. But of course, Senegal will have a defence. They’ll argue that they did not complete a full refusal to play – they stopped play momentarily but did eventually come back to finish the match – which could prevent Caf and Fifa from going scorched earth. Accusations of favouritism towards host nation Morocco – which coach Walid Regragui firmly rejected – may also be levied, fuelled by the two questionable stoppage-time decisions that went against Senegal. Simply, the regulations must now be reviewed to decide what consti tutes match abandonment. How long does a team have to refuse to play to be deemed refusing to play? When does a protest turn into a complete disregard for the rules? From conspiracies to comeup pance, there is still so much of this story to be told. For now, we just have condemnation. That will not be enough. – The Independent

I T WAS the most monumental case of picking up your ball and going home in football history. Over the course of an extraordi nary 16-minute exodus, Pape Thiaw and Senegal plunged the 2025 Africa Cup of Nations into infamy. Yet the toxicity has not been con tained – the next steps will be telling for the future of the competition and, perhaps, for international football as a whole. The prevailing emotion from one of the most contentious continental finals conceivable is raw injustice. It was the sentiment that sparked the Teranga Lions’ protest, feeling aggrieved that a soft VAR call was seemingly about to cost them a sec ond Afcon title. The wave of despondency that comes with such gut-wrenching decisions is an all-too-familiar expe rience for football fans, so in the moment when referee Jean-Jacques Ndala pointed to the spot, there was sympathy for Senegal. It was short lived. To say that Thiaw’s subsequent actions were overblown is an almighty understatement. Never before in the VAR era has a team gone to such an extent to pro test a decision, at least at this level. Under the orders of their manager, green shirts went from surrounding the referee, to lingering on the touch line, to disappearing entirely. Well, almost entirely. If not for talisman Sadio Mane’s defiance, whose visible desperation to restart the game likely provided incentive for Ndala to hold off on any decision to abandon the match, Senegal’s walk-off could have sparked an even more stunning turn of events on Africa’s biggest stage. An Afcon final realistically could have ended in a forfeit. By the book, it should have. Under Afcon regulations, if a team “refuses to play or leaves the ground before the regular end of the match without the authorisation of the refe ree”, they will be deemed the loser and their opponents will automati cally be given a 3-0 win, as per Articles 82 and 84. This is supported by the

Senegal’s head coach Pape Thiaw (in black) and Sadio Mane (No. 10) celebrate after winning the Africa Cup of Nations final at the Prince Moulay Abdellah Stadium in Rabat on Sunday. – AFPPIC

ahead of disciplinary proceedings. But Morocco will demand more. It’s the Atlas Lions that are now the ones racked by injustice. Now comes the fallout of one of football’s most chaotic nights, with the game’s governing bodies left to

(RM84,000). Financial sanctions will be con sidered the bare minimum punish ment coming Senegal’s way, with Caf having so far condemned the “unac ceptable behaviour” and said it will review footage of the Afcon final

Confederation of African Football’s (CAF) official rules on abandonment (Article 148), which deems that any team that “refuses to play a match or continue playing one which has begun” will forfeit the game and be subject to a fine of at least US$20,000

theSun is published and printed by Sun Media Corporation Sdn Bhd (221220-K) of Lot 6, Jalan 51/217, 46050 Petaling Jaya, Selangor. Tel: 03-7784 6688 • Tel (Editorial): 03-7784 6688 Fax: 03-7785 2625 Email: newsdesk@thesundaily.com • Tel (Advertising): 03-7784 8888 Email: advertise@thesundaily.com